🔗 Share this article

Last year, actor Jude Law remarked he had no concerns about backlash for portraying the Russian leader in a new film. This production, though, may align too neatly with the carefully constructed version circulated by official channels that, within Russia, it functions as a compliment rather than a critique.

The Crafted Superhero

Over a long period, the Russian political apparatus and its entertainment industry have collaborated to forge a tailor-made version of Putin. This character is an infallible strategist devoid of flaws, a former spy reimagined as a local 007 who consistently understands more than he reveals.

“In Russia, the constructed Putin has long overshadowed the actual person.”

Cinematic Reinforcement

A notable instance is a TV series released last fall, helmed by a Kremlin supporter. Its main character is a fictional security officer selected by fate to “rescue” the nation from chaos. While he is called a different name, the implication is unmistakable: the hero must be a known figure from the secret services.

Western portrayals often end up reinforcing this same narrative instead of undercutting it. An adaptation inspired by a bestselling satirical novel sets out to subvert the leader's mythology by presenting him as a symptom but as a consequence, shifting the focus to the spin doctors surrounding him.

The Myth of the Reluctant Leader

In the film, the president is presented as having been chosen by powerful oligarchs to steady the nation because he is “a fit former intelligence agent”. They visit him and all but beg him to take the top job. His response is that he would rather govern from the shadows, seeking enduring influence.

This narrative is the Kremlin’s export myth: the cool, reluctant strategist guided by fate. Historically, these events ever happened.

The Reality of the Casting Call

Nobody actually pleaded with Putin to accept the role. The presidency was effectively a casting call with no shortage of contenders. At the centre to the selection stood a powerful businessman from the previous administration who expected to run the country de facto.

• His list featured several politicians, among them an opposition leader subsequently assassinated and a security service director.
• According to an expert who studied Putin’s biography, the future president merely met the necessary criteria: loyal, from the security services, and politically neutral.
• A businessman familiar with the process said the primary requirement was manageability and loyalty, not leadership.

“They didn’t need a powerful leader, they needed someone malleable, someone who would follow instructions.”

Constructing the Spy Legend

Analysts concur that the image of him as a master operative was constructed retrospectively. Claims about his clandestine activities in East Germany do not stand up to scrutiny. In essence, he was an administrator and routine duties, a low-level clerk not engaged in actual agent work.

Interestingly, the shift to framing him as a “007” could partly have been inspired by Daniel Craig’s debut as 007. The grittier interpretation led local outlets and online audiences to make comparisons with their leader. Mashup posters swapping Craig’s face with Putin’s surfaced on Moscow streets, feeding the growing tendency to see him as a Russian 007.

A Propaganda Win?

Given the casting, an actor well-liked by viewers there, the Kremlin are likely to seize the chance to frame his casting as a minor diplomatic triumph. The film's omission of public dissent, the opposition, or prominent activists from its narrative, despite covering recent years, is a pleasant bonus for state propaganda.

Domestically, Putin is often an all-powerful presence who remains unseen directly. He is signaled through photographs or calls “from above”. In this new film, he at last gets a famous actor's visage—one that may inadvertently echo the very myths it might seek to examine.